Most advice on pursuing goals focuses on what you can do to achieve your own aims. But how can you help those you love to achieve their goals? Relationship partners play an important role in helping or hindering our progress toward our goals.1
Here are seven science-backed tips for helping your partner:
1. Encourage your partner
Research shows that encouragement from romantic partners to pursue goals in areas such as career, school, friendship, and fitness makes people more likely to actually achieve those goals.2
2. Don’t let your partner become paralyzed by potential obstacles, and encourage them to focus on the positive aspects of achieving their goals3
But this doesn’t mean blindly ignoring those obstacles: It’s important to consider obstacles and plan for how to overcome them.4
3. Help your partner develop strategies that will aid in pursuing their goals
If their goal is to exercise more, help them to come up with a specific plan and focus on goals that are realistic and attainable.3 It’s important that these plans are specific (e.g., jog for 15 minutes on the treadmill before work), rather than general (e.g., exercise 3 times a week).
4. Help your partner avoid other activities that will use up their willpower
According to the ego depletion theory of willpower, exerting self-control on one activity uses up your resources, making it more difficult to muster the will for another difficult task.5 For example, if you’re buckling down for hours cramming for an exam, then venture into the kitchen for a late night snack, it will be especially difficult to resist choosing the chocolate cake over the apple because you’ve depleted your willpower. So if you want to help your partner have the motivation to pursue a goal, try to help them to avoid other, less important, activities that require effort and willpower. For example, if your partner is trying to quit smoking, don’t ask them to go to a work party where they’ll have to socialize with people they dislike. Your actual interactions with your partner can also be more or less draining—effortful social interactions can deplete your willpower.6 For example, in a study where people played charades with a partner, working with a guesser with whom they were well-synchronized actually helped them persist longer at an unrelated physical task.7
5. Don’t be controlling
Trying to control your partner’s actions can backfire. When people feel as though their freedom to do what they want is being threatened, they’ll cling to that threatened freedom more—like a child who desperately wants to play with a specific toy simply because it’s forbidden.8 When you try to control your partner, you’re restricting their freedom. For example, a wife who pushes unwanted healthy dinners on her husband may inadvertently make him even more likely to grab fast food at work. This process also operates on the unconscious level. In two experiments, researchers found that simply reminding people of a partner who tries to control them caused them to behave in ways that directly opposed that person’s desires.9
6. Don’t interfere unnecessarily10
Sometimes your partner may not want or need your help. Providing help that isn’t needed or wanted can be viewed as threatening to the self and may make people feel that their partner doesn’t have faith in them11 or can make them feel indebted to the giver.12
7. Be subtle
People sometimes respond negatively to obvious efforts to help, so providing help in a way that is indirect and less noticeable can be effective. When the recipient doesn’t realize they’ve been helped, it avoids the potential negative consequences of feeling controlled, indebted, or threatened. In one study, law students studying for the bar examination felt more anxious on days on which they believed their romantic partners had provided emotional support, and less anxious on days when they believed the partners had not provided any emotional support, but their romantic partners claimed that they had.13
A version of this article orginally appeared on Psychology Today.
Interested in learning more about relationships? Click here for other topics on Science of Relationships. Like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter to get our articles delivered directly to your NewsFeed. Learn more about our book and download it here.
Dr. Gwendolyn Seidman – Science of Relationships articles | Twitter
Gwen’s research focuses on self-presentation on the Internet, particularly the expression of hidden self-aspects online and the presentation of romantic relationships on social media. She also studies social support in couples, and the role of romantic partners’ perceptions of one another in relationship satisfaction and conflict. Gwen teaches courses on social psychology, the self, and close relationships, and also has a blog at Psychology Today called Close Encounters.
1Fitzsimons, G. M., & Finkel, E. J. (2010). Interpersonal influences on self regulation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 101-105.
2Brunstein, J. C., Dangelmayer, G., & Schultheiss, O. C. (1996). Personal goals and social support in close relationships: Effects on relationship mood and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1006–1019.
3Feeney, B. C., & Collins, N. L. (in press). A new look at social support: A theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
4Oettingen, G. (2014). Rethinking positive thinking: Inside the new science of motivation. New York: Penguin Group.
5Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavasky, E., Muraven, M., Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252-1265.
6Finkel, E. J., Campbell, W. K., Brunell, A. B., Dalton, A. N., Chartrand, T. L., & Scarbeck, S. J. (2006). High-maintenance interaction: Inefficient social coordination impairs self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 456–475
7Knowles, M. L., Finkel, E. J., & Williams, K. (2007). Bolstering self regulation through social lubrication. Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University, as cited in Fitzsimons, G. M., & Finkel, E. J. (2010). Interpersonal influences on self regulation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 101-105.
8Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control. Academic Press.
9Chartrand, T. L., Dalton, A., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2007). Relationship reactance: When priming significant others triggers opposing goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 719–726.
10Coyne, J. C., Wortman, C. B., & Lehman, D. R. (1988). The other side of support: Emotional overinvolvement and miscarried helping. In B. H. Gottlieb (Ed.), Marshaling social support: Formats, processes, and effects (pp. 305–330). Newbury Park, CA: Sage
11Burke, C. T., & Goren, J. (in press). Self-evaluative consequences of social support receipt: The role of context self-relevance. Personal Relationships.
12Gleason, M. E. J., Iida, M., Bolger, N., & Shrout, P. E. (2003). Daily supportive equity in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1036-1045.
13Bolger, N., Zuckerman, A., & Kessler, R. C. (2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 953–961.
image souce: fitstudio.com
